![]() The "Differences" section needs more quotes from the comic book to support the last paragraph (eg, stating that the comic took place at location A while the film at location B is a fair difference that can be sourced to the primary work itself) - the second-to-last para of this section, however, is going to likely need some secondary sources to establish a differentiation in character between works. I'm not seeing a problem with the 3 non-frees - movie poster is acceptable, and the two in-film shots show scenes of imagary/symbolism discussed in the text. Comment Most of the issues outside of the sourcing (lack of, and selection of) should be fixable with some elbow grease (some has been done, noted above). ![]() Comment: I've re-organized all the sections, improved the infobox, and unbolded the cast, to meet the WP:MOSFILM guidelines.Sandy Georgia ( Talk) 23:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC) ![]() The FAR phase is intended to evaluate and improve articles Remove or Keep are declared if the article moves to FARC. Please read the instructions at WP:FAR.I think Collectionian did a good job in listing the faults. Though interestingly, the differences section seems to have had more sources at one point. It passed FAR in 2007, with even worse problems (like the use of a spoiler template, more non-free images, etc). As MikeAllen notes, that version isn't much better. Collectonian, did you consider a revert to or compare to the version that previously passed FAR? Sandy Georgia ( Talk) 21:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC).Please add alt text to images see WP:ALT. I also am concerned that it has too many non-free images, with neither of the two appearing in the body seeming to be necessary nor sourced to their claims. The lead does not meet WP:LEAD as it is not properly summarizing the article. The music section should be part of production or under home media as a subsection home media also gets overly detailed on the DVD releases. It has several badly done quote breakouts (which should only be used for those 4 lines or longer). "Publicity and release" should likely be added there as well, or publicity moved to production and release made a single section with home media merged in. Themes should be below plot, development and production really should just be a single section. The article does not follow WP:MOSFILM well, and the sectioning is a little excessive. The citation formatting is not consistent, with some having bare references, others using templates, and many missing basic details like author, date, etc. It is also using unreliable sources, including IMDB, some personal websites and self-published blogs, etc. The article contains vast amounts of unsourced content in the article, particularly in "Tie-ins" (unsourced), "Music" (unsourced), and "Differences between the film and graphic novel" (almost entirely unsourced, making it pure WP:OR). I just tagged it with clean up and ref improve tags. I am nominating this featured article for review because I feel it no longer meets the featured article criteria. Notified: Mailer diablo, Bdj, P-Chan, Cvene64, Oscarthecat, WikiProject Films, WikiProject LGBT studies, WikiProject Comics, WikiProject London, WikiProject Politics, Featured article review/V for Vendetta (film)/archive2.Featured article review/V for Vendetta (film)/archive1. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |